|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why Not Focus On The Strongest Utility Stocks? . What is the lesson here? If you are looking for the greatest total return, focus on stocks that have the strongest pattern of price appreciation and do not turn away from a stock just because it does not have the highest current yield. Though a person who invests in a stock with a pattern of modest appreciation and a relatively high yield should do well over time, a person who invests only in those utilities that have the strongest stocks (and who adjusts the portfolio throughout the year whenever necessary to keep it invested in the very strongest of utility stocks) should do even better, even if the current yield of the portfolio's stocks is somewhat lower. This strategy should not only reap outsized gains through capital appreciation, but also capture some nice dividend bonuses along the way. What if you need the highest dividends possible? Do not simply go for the largest yield. There may be a reason the yield is so high. For example, say the stock is priced at $100 and pays a dividend of $4 or 4%. Then, bad news hits the company. Perhaps a nuclear facility has had radiation leakage or the firm becomes entangled in a lawsuit and is charged with defrauding their customers. The company's stock will plummet. If the stock suddenly drops to $60, its yield will be 6.66%! The person who buys the stock may think he is getting a great deal, but what will he think when the stock is selling for $5 and the dividend is discontinued? Again, start with a list of the strongest utilities and then review their dividends. We list these utilities in order of their strength rank. Therefore, if you want a stock with a very high dividend and strong price appreciation, go down the list starting at the top. Check each stock's dividend until you find one that is acceptable. Then look up its pattern of dividend increases. In fact, if you want a portfolio that will give the highest total return, you could buy ten utilities from the top of the strength list regardless of their dividends. You could consider the dividends a bonus and not the primary objective. Over time you will have invested in the strongest utilities and very probably will have picked up dividend bonuses along the way. Whatever your objective, we believe the best starting point is strength, not current yield. By focusing on consistent strength, you have a better chance of avoiding stocks that have a high yield because their stocks are in trouble. We create a list of the Strongest Utilities arranged for you in rank order and updated daily. Below, we give strategies for creating a utility portfolio based on these lists. Pay close attention to the following, because it makes all the difference in the execution of a successful discipline. Our strength rank algorithm goes far beyond the simplistic Relative Strength RSI used at other Web sites. The Relative Strength Index is an oscillator that ranges between 0 and 100 and is based on the ratio of upward price changes to downward price changes over a short period of time (usually 14 days). Our own strength indicator is far more sophisticated. If you scan 2000 stocks with the Relative Strength Index, you will find that many of the stocks that rank high are not really attractive because of overhead resistance or because the surge of strength measured is not really significant for some other reason (a non-significant rebound in a very unattractive or threatening chart pattern). The list selected by our own strength screens, however, will look much more attractive. The more stocks that are screened, the greater the difference will be in the quality of output. To see an illustration of how the output of the two systems can differ, visit the Strongest Stocks page. We use the same algorithm there that we use here, and we have included some charts there that illustrate the difference in screen results for the RSI and our much more sophisticated strength algorithm. The master list that we use in our rankings includes electric utilities, telecommunication service companies, gas utilities, and water utilities. The utilities we post in our ranking list will be the "strongest" 50 at the time of posting (ranked in order of strength). . Sample List (Strength Rank in Dark Red at Left of Name)
Strategies For Using The List Please remember that our reports do NOT constitute a recommendation that you personally buy or sell any securities. In the following discussion the words "buy" and "sell" refer to imaginary transactions in a theoretical portfolio and not to transactions in a real account. The word "you" is used for editorial purposes only and does not refer to you personally. The strategies that can be used with this list of the "Strongest Utilities" are similar to those that can be used with high-strength ETF portfolios. Here are just a few ideas for your consideration. You could use our lists several ways. For example, you might put the more attractive utilities on a "watch list" and review their charts daily, waiting for one of them to decline to its rising trendline. Then, as it begins to rebound off this support line, you could buy it for your portfolio. Your sell strategy might consist of selling any utility that falls below its supporting trendline. You might buy the top 5 or 10 utilities and sell any that fall out of the top 30. Then you could replace it with one of the top 5 or 10 that you do not currently have in your portfolio. For your convenience and for easy reference, the relative rank of each utility is posted to the left of the utility’s name. This concept is quite flexible. You might sell when a utility falls out of the top 10, top 20, top 50, or whatever. You could build your portfolio around 5, 7, or 10 positions, based on your portfolio size, investment needs, objectives, and tolerance for risk. Other strategies might be to select those from among the top 30 (or from a larger or smaller subset of the top 50 listed) that look the most "timely" (the most likely to move up soon) or to select those that have just moved up in rank (a move up in rank suggests new momentum or an increase of public interest in that utility). There are many ways you could define your selling strategy. You could sell any utility that drops 5%, 7%, 10% or some other percentage below your purchase price, or below the highest high, low or close reached by the utility since its inclusion in your portfolio. You may opt to combine strategies so that a sale occurs if a utility falls out of the top 30, if it declines 8% since its inclusion, or if it falls 10 levels (or some other amount) in its ranking. Of course, some of the strongest selling disciplines factor in volatility. For example, when the decline of a utility is such that there is only one chance in a hundred that it would fall that much "by chance" or as a result of its "normal fluctuation" given its current level of volatility, a sale might be appropriate (because it represents a move beyond the "normal probability envelope" for price spikes). This is where the Stops tool can be a big help. Click on Stops (on the navigation bar or in the set of links at the bottom of this page) for more information on this. Sometimes a stock that is highly ranked might not be as attractive as a stock that is not ranked as highly but that is more likely to rise soon from current levels (perhaps because it is nearer to support or in the process of rebounding from support). An important consideration here is your anticipated holding period. Short-term traders will want to capture their gains quickly. That means they will be a little more "picky" about a stock’s "setup" and the timing of the purchase. Say, for example, that your selections are limited to utilities ranking among the 30 strongest. A portfolio that is always invested in the top 30 utilities should do quite well over time. We would expect it to perform much better than most of the better performing mutual funds. Then there is the probability that many of the stocks selected over the course of the year will also pay great dividends. Combining both high dividends with stock strength should result in a very high total return. Unless you have selected a strategy that requires it, it is not necessary to monitor a utility portfolio on a daily basis. Portfolio adjustments can be made once a week or once a month, depending on your strategy. We once managed a utility portfolio strategy that required adjustments only once a quarter, and its average annual return was about 20% a year for over 15 years after fees and expenses. Those who are bent on obtaining the highest level of performance might want to fine-tune their entry points for new positions by monitoring the charts of purchase candidates (their "watch list") each day after the market's close. Once they make their purchases and set their stops, they could then make weekly rather than daily reviews. Others will simply look at the charts of highly ranked utilities once a week and make their decisions on the basis of their weekly reviews. Of course, there are also those who will want to monitor their portfolio on a daily basis in order to optimize performance. The strength algorithms used in generating the list are the same as the ones used for The Valuator's "STR RANK" (Strength Rank) measurement and in its "Highest Strength List." We have said that the calculations are far more complex than the simple RSI Index calculations used to measure "strength" at most Web sites. Lists based on the RSI are much more likely to have "setup" problems. Our strength model is proprietary. However, to give you an idea of what we mean by "more complex," we will say that it requires 6 algorithms for the first sort and then 3 more algorithms are applied to the results of the first sort to derive the final scores. The results of the latter are then ranked and the top 50 are listed here. Before purchasing a utility, you should look at its chart. To see a few Web sites where you can generate free charts, click on "Links" at the bottom of our Home page then click on "Outside Help." Our algorithm is proprietary and it is far more effective than the Relative Strength Index (RSI) at finding securities that are really strong. If you haven't already done so, we urge you to use the "Strongest Stocks" tab on the navigation menu to see some charts that illustrate the difference between the selections made by using the RSI and those made by using our algorithm. It took time and effort to test and perfect our algorithm, and it is available nowhere else on the Internet. The costs to operate a Web site are greater when that site provides unique content (we do not obtain our content through the use of "cookie cutter" uploads and we do not clutter our site with third-party advertisements). Therefore, in order to get a modest return for our efforts, we are charging an annual fee of $95 for the complete list of the 50 highest ranked utilities arranged in rank order and updated daily. You may be able to find free lists elsewhere on the Internet, but those lists will almost certainly be made by using the RSI. [It is standard practice to use the RSI to find strength in stocks because it is a cheap, quick, and easy pre-packaged upload for Web sites that do not have the mathematical expertise necessary to create more effective screening algorithms. At Stock Disciplines we do our own "number-crunching," model creation, system testing, and algorithm development. Even our Stops tool was created in-house] The RSI will often rank a stock highly even though it has a terrible chart configuration and dominating overhead resistance nearby while completely missing an stock with a much better chart pattern or even a pre-surge "setup" and more persistent strength. Our algorithm avoids that problem. Its lists actually do consist of the utilities with the greatest persistent strength arranged in rank order. . In Value Line’s SELECTION AND OPINION dated August 17, 1990, Milton Schlein, associate director at the Value Line Investment Survey, compared the relative merits of bonds and electric utility stocks. He examined the behavior of both types of investment from 1977 through 1989, because this period included wide movements in interest rates. He concluded that utility stocks have superior total returns whether interest rates were going up or down. During the worst period, when interest rates went up dramatically, bonds dropped more than 40% while utilities dropped less than half as much. Then, when interest rates were falling between 1981 and 1986, bonds went up 64% while utilities went up almost 100%. Schlein concluded that call provisions and maturity hampered bond performance while dividend increases helped utilities become far less sensitive to rising interest rates. . Links To Other Places On This Web Site Stop Losses Stops Products The Valuator StockAlerts Trading Tools About Us Contact Us Fees & Refunds Links Index . All pages on this Web site are protected by copyright Copyright 2010 by Stock Disciplines, LLC No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form by any means. .
.
.
.
"But thou shalt remember the Lord thy God: for it is he that giveth thee power to get wealth." Deut. 8:18
.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||